↓ Skip to main content

Temperature-related mortality in France, a comparison between regions with different climates from the perspective of global warming

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biometeorology, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Temperature-related mortality in France, a comparison between regions with different climates from the perspective of global warming
Published in
International Journal of Biometeorology, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00484-006-0045-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Laaidi, Karine Laaidi, Jean-Pierre Besancenot

Abstract

This paper aims to explain the results of an observational population study that was carried out between 1991 and 1995 in six regions (departments) in France. The study was to assess the relationship between temperature and mortality in a few areas of France that offer widely varying climatic conditions and lifestyles, to determine their thermal optimum, defined as a 3 degrees C temperature band with the lowest mortality rate in each area, and then to compare the mortality rates from this baseline band with temperatures above and below the baseline. The study period was selected because it did not include extreme cold or hot events such as a heatwave. Data on daily deaths from each department were first used to examine the entire population and then to examine men, women, various age groups and various causes of death (respiratory disease, stroke, ischaemic heart disease, other disease of the circulatory system, and all other causes excluding violent deaths). Mean temperatures were provided by the National Weather Service. The results depicted an asymmetrical V- or U-shaped relationship between mortality and temperature, with a thermal optimum lower for the elderly, and generally lower for women than for men except in Paris. The relationship was also different depending on the cause of death. In all cases, more evidence was collected showing that cold weather was more deadly than hot weather, and it would now be interesting to enlarge the study to include years with cold spells and heatwaves. Furthermore, the results obtained could be of great use in estimating weather-related mortality as a consequence of future climate-change scenarios.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2011.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biometeorology
#516
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,988
of 65,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biometeorology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them