↓ Skip to main content

Growth Mechanism of SiC CVD: Surface Etching by H2, H Atoms, and HCl

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry A, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth Mechanism of SiC CVD: Surface Etching by H2, H Atoms, and HCl
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, February 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10800
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pitsiri Sukkaew, Örjan Danielsson, Lars Ojamäe

Abstract

Silicon carbide is a wide bandgap semiconductor with unique characteristics suitable for high temperature and high power applications. Fabrication of SiC epitaxial layers is usually performed using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In this work, we use quantum chemical density functional theory (B3LYP and M06-2X) and transition state theory to study etching reactions happening on the surface of SiC during CVD in order to combine etching effects to the surface kinetic model for SiC CVD. H2, H atoms and HCl gases are chosen in the study as the most likely etchants responsible for surface etching. We consider etchings of four surface sites, namely CH3(ads), SiH3-CH2(ads), SiH2-(CH2)2(ads), SiH-(CH2)3(ads), which represent four subsequent snapshots of the surface as the growth proceeds. We find that H atoms are the most effective etchant on CH3(ads) and SiH3-CH2(ads), which represent the first and second steps of the growth. HCl and H2 are shown to be much less effective than H atoms and produce the etching rate constants which are ~104 and ~107 times slower. In comparison to CH3(ads), SiH3-CH2(ads) is shown to be less stable and more susceptible to etchings. Unlike the first and second steps of the growth, the third and fourth steps (i.e. SiH2-(CH2)2(ads) and SiH-(CH2)3(ads)) are stable and much less susceptible to any of the three etchants considered. This implies that the growth species become more stable via forming Si-C bonds with another surface species. The formation of a larger surface cluster thus helps stabilizing the growth against etchings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 8 30%
Chemistry 4 15%
Engineering 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,947,998
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#5,951
of 10,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,794
of 448,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#195
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.