↓ Skip to main content

The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00431-018-3114-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis Bellos, Georgia Fitrou, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Nikolaos Thomakos, Despina N. Perrea, Georgios Daskalakis

Abstract

There is growing evidence that presepsin is a promising biomarker in the diagnosis of sepsis in adults. The objective of our study is to investigate current evidence related to the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis. To accomplish this, we searched the Medline (1966-2017), Scopus (2004-2017), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008-2017), EMBASE (1980-2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2017), and Google Scholar (2004-2017) databases. Eleven studies were included in the present meta-analysis, with a total number of 783 neonates. The pooled sensitivity of serum presepsin for the prediction of neonatal sepsis was 0.91 (95% CI [0.87-0.93]) and the pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI [0.88-0.94]). The diagnostic odds ratio was 170.28 (95% CI [51.13-567.11]) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9751 (SE 0.0117). Head-to-head comparison with AUC values of C-reactive protein (0.9748 vs. 0.8580) and procalcitonin (0.9596 vs. 0.7831) revealed that presepsin was more sensitive in detecting neonatal sepsis. Current evidence support the use of presepsin in the early neonatal period in high-risk populations as its diagnostic accuracy seems to be high in detecting neonatal sepsis. What is known: • Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. • Current laboratory tests cannot accurately discriminate endangered neonates. What is new: • The diagnostic odds ratio of presepsin is 170.28 and the area under the curve is 0.9751. • According to our meta-analysis, presepsin is a useful protein that may help clinicians identify neonates at risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 45 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 56 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,981,096
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#236
of 3,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,311
of 330,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.