↓ Skip to main content

Fate and Transport of Pesticides in the Ground Water Systems of Southwest Georgia, 1993–2005

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Quality, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate and Transport of Pesticides in the Ground Water Systems of Southwest Georgia, 1993–2005
Published in
Journal of Environmental Quality, September 2008
DOI 10.2134/jeq2007.0163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda S. Dalton, Elizabeth A. Frick

Abstract

Modern agricultural practices in the United States have resulted in nearly unrivaled efficiency and productivity. Unfortunately, there is also the potential for release of these compounds to the environment and consequent adverse affects on wildlife and human populations. Since 1993, the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program of the U.S. Geological Survey has evaluated water quality in agricultural areas to address these concerns. The objective of this study is to evaluate trends in pesticide concentrations from 1993-2005 in the surficial and Upper Floridan aquifers of southwest Georgia using pesticide and pesticide degradate data collected for the NAWQA program. There were six compounds-five herbicides and one degradate-that were detected in more than 20% of samples: atrazine, deethylatrazine (DEA), metolachlor, alachlor, floumeturon, and tebuthiuron. Of the 128 wells sampled during the study, only eight wells had pesticide concentrations that either increased (7) or decreased (1) on a decadal time scale. Most of the significant trends were increasing concentrations of pesticides in older water; median pesticide concentrations did not differ between the surficial and Upper Floridan aquifers from 1993 and 2005. Deethylatrazine, in the Upper Floridan aquifer, was the only compound that had a significant change (increase) in concentration during the study. The limited number of wells with increases in pesticide concentrations suggest that ground-water sources of these compounds are not increasing in concentration over the time scale represented in this study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2015.
All research outputs
#19,861,036
of 24,406,678 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#2,559
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,534
of 91,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,678 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.