| Title |
3L, 5L, What the L? A NICE Conundrum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40273-018-0622-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy Devlin, John Brazier, A. Simon Pickard, Elly Stolk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,145,174
of 24,733,536 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#147
of 1,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,139
of 335,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,733,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.