| Title |
Integrated bio-economic models as tools to support land-use decision making: a review of potential and limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioeconomics, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10818-018-9270-6 |
| Authors |
Luz Maria Castro, Fabian Härtl, Santiago Ochoa, Baltazar Calvas, Leonardo Izquierdo, Thomas Knoke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,563,368
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioeconomics
#43
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,635
of 348,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioeconomics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.