↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary relationships among G protein-coupled receptors using a clustered database approach

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary relationships among G protein-coupled receptors using a clustered database approach
Published in
The AAPS Journal, June 2001
DOI 10.1208/ps030212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard C. Graul, Wolfgang Sadée

Abstract

Guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise large and diverse gene families in fungi, plants, and the animal kingdom. GPCRs appear to share a common structure with 7 transmembrane segments, but sequence similarity is minimal among the most distant GPCRs. To reevaluate the question of evolutionary relationships among the disparate GPCR families, this study takes advantage of the dramatically increased number of cloned GPCRs. Sequences were selected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant peptide database using iterative BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) searches to yield a database of approximately 1700 GPCRs and unrelated membrane proteins as controls, divided into 34 distinct clusters. For each cluster, separate position-specific matrices were established to optimize sequence comparisons among GPCRs. This approach resulted in significant alignments between distant GPCR families, including receptors for the biogenic amine/peptide, VIP/secretin, cAMP, STE3/MAP3 fungal pheromones, latrophilin, developmental receptors frizzled and smoothened, as well as the more distant metabotrobic glutamate receptors, the STE2/MAM2 fungal pheromone receptors, and GPR1, a fungal glucose receptor. On the other hand, alignment scores between these recognized GPCR clades with p40 (putative GPCR) and pm1 (putative GPCR), as well as bacteriorhodopsins, failed to support a finding of homology. This study provides a refined view of GPCR ancestry and serves as a reference database with hyperlinks to other sources. Moreover, it may facilitate database annotation and the assignment of orphan receptors to GPCR families.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#283
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,012
of 41,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them