↓ Skip to main content

Death and the oculocardiac reflex

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Death and the oculocardiac reflex
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, August 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf03015643
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Brian Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Engineering 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,391
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,157
of 20,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.