↓ Skip to main content

Safety of trovafloxacin in treatment of lower respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Safety of trovafloxacin in treatment of lower respiratory tract infections
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, June 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf01691582
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Williams, S. Hopkins

Abstract

Safety and toleration of oral trovafloxacin has been assessed in Phase III trials in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections. Patients were treated orally with either trovafloxacin 100 or 200 mg (n=881) or a comparator (500 or 1000 mg amoxicillin, or 625 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; n = 593). Adverse events were recorded in 112 (12.7%) trovafloxacin- and 74 (12.5%) comparator-treated patients. Frequency of effects on the autonomic nervous, musculoskeletal, respiratory, special senses, urinary and reproductive systems was <1%. Photosensitivity reactions were not reported in trovafloxacin-treated patients. Central or peripheral nervous system adverse effects (headache and dizziness) were slightly more common in trovafloxacin-treated patients (4.4% vs 1.9%). Patients treated with comparators experienced gastrointestinal events more frequently (6.1% vs 8.3%). Comparable incidences of adverse events were reported in patients > or = 65-years-old. Most events were mild to moderate in severity. Treatment was discontinued because of an adverse event in 18 (2%) trovafloxacin- and four (0.7%) comparator-treated patients. Despite the high prevalence of risk factors, serious adverse events were rare and the mortality rate over the 35-day study period was low: trovafloxacin 0.8%, comparator agents 1.5%. Laboratory test abnormalities were recorded in less than 1% of patients in either treatment group.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Unspecified 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#778
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,348
of 34,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.