↓ Skip to main content

The MAMI C accelerator

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The MAMI C accelerator
Published in
Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, September 2011
DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01481-4
Authors

M. Dehn, K. Aulenbacher, R. Heine, H. -J. Kreidel, U. Ludwig-Mertin, A. Jankowiak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 50%
Computer Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#286
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,324
of 141,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.