| Title |
Convex measures of risk and trading constraints
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Finance and Stochastics, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s007800200072 |
| Authors |
Hans Föllmer, Alexander Schied |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 29% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 30 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 12% |
| Engineering | 14 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Finance and Stochastics
#5
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,741
of 49,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Finance and Stochastics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them