↓ Skip to main content

LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts

Overview of attention for article published in Formal Methods in System Design, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
486 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts
Published in
Formal Methods in System Design, July 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011227529550
Authors

Werner Damm, David Harel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 3 2%
France 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 139 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 33%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 87 54%
Physics and Astronomy 19 12%
Engineering 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 15 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Formal Methods in System Design
#6
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Formal Methods in System Design
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.