↓ Skip to main content

A Controlled Trial of Inhaled Bronchodilators in Familial Dysautonomia

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
A Controlled Trial of Inhaled Bronchodilators in Familial Dysautonomia
Published in
Lung, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00408-017-0073-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bat-el Bar-Aluma, Ori Efrati, Horacio Kaufmann, Jose-Alberto Palma, Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann

Abstract

Chronic lung disease is a leading cause of premature death in patients with familial dysautonomia (FD). A significant number of patients have obstructive airway disease, yet it is not known whether this is pharmacologically reversible. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing the beta 2 agonist albuterol with the muscarinic blocker ipratropium bromide in patients homozygous for the IKBKAP founder mutation. Albuterol, ipratropium bromide, and placebo were administered on 3 separate days via nebulizer in the seated position. Airway responsiveness was evaluated using spirometry and impulse oscillometry 30 min post dose. Cardiovascular effects were evaluated by continuous monitoring of blood pressure, RR intervals, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance. A total of 14 patients completed the trial. Neither active agent had significant detrimental effects on heart rate or rhythm or blood pressure. Albuterol and ipratropium were similar in their bronchodilator effectiveness causing significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1, p = 0.002 and p = 0.030). Impulse oscillometry measures were consistent with a reduction in total airway resistance post nebulization (resistance at 5 Hz p < 0.006). Airway obstruction is pharmacologically reversible in a number of patients with FD. In the short term, both albuterol and ipratropium were well tolerated and not associated with major cardiovascular adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#664
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,088
of 439,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.