↓ Skip to main content

Digestive strategy of the asian colobine genusTrachypithecus

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Digestive strategy of the asian colobine genusTrachypithecus
Published in
Primates, April 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02557555
Authors

Judith M. Caton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Psychology 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,684,170
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#476
of 1,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,310
of 36,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.