↓ Skip to main content

Growth variability in the late Vendian problematics Parvancorina Glaessner

Overview of attention for article published in Paleontological Journal, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Growth variability in the late Vendian problematics Parvancorina Glaessner
Published in
Paleontological Journal, February 2009
DOI 10.1134/s003103010901002x
Authors

E. B. Naimark, A. Yu. Ivantsov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 18%
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Master 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 73%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#138
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,504
of 170,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.