| Title |
Heavy metal contamination and physiological variability in the Brazilian mangrove crabs Ucides cordatus and Callinectes danae (Crustacea: Decapoda)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, November 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002270000382 |
| Authors |
R. R. Harris, M. C. F. Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,340
of 3,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,810
of 41,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.