↓ Skip to main content

Affordances in the design of enactive systems

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Affordances in the design of enactive systems
Published in
Virtual Reality, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10055-006-0025-7
Authors

Thomas A. Stoffregen, Benoît G. Bardy, Bruno Mantel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 60 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Professor 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 20%
Psychology 14 20%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Design 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#56
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,933
of 66,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them