↓ Skip to main content

Phosphite reduces disease extension of a Phytophthora cinnamomi front in Banksia woodland, even after fire

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Plant Pathology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Phosphite reduces disease extension of a Phytophthora cinnamomi front in Banksia woodland, even after fire
Published in
Australasian Plant Pathology, June 2004
DOI 10.1071/ap04002
Authors

B. L. Shearer, C. E. Crane, R. G. Fairman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 50%
Environmental Science 5 23%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Pathology
#78
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 62,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.