↓ Skip to main content

Jayasena’s Proof of the Authenticity of the Mahāyāna Scriptures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Indian Philosophy, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 255)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Jayasena’s Proof of the Authenticity of the Mahāyāna Scriptures
Published in
Journal of Indian Philosophy, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10781-018-9350-x
Authors

Shigeki Moro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,298,684
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Indian Philosophy
#10
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,127
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Indian Philosophy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them