↓ Skip to main content

Reducing risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study to explore the potential of technology in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Reducing risk of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study to explore the potential of technology in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x695297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian McMillan, Katherine Easton, Elizabeth Goyder, Brigitte Delaney, Priya Madhuvrata, Reem Abdelgalil, Caroline Mitchell

Abstract

Despite the seven-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among females previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GD), annual rates of follow-up in primary care are low. There is a need to consider how to reduce the incidence of progression to T2DM among this high-risk group. To examine the views of females diagnosed with GD to ascertain how to improve primary care support postnatally, and the potential role of technology in reducing the risk of progression to T2DM. A qualitative study of a purposive sample of 27 postnatal females leaving secondary care with a recent diagnosis of GD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 females, who had been previously diagnosed with GD, at around 6-12 weeks postnatally. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Facilitators and barriers to engaging in a healthy postnatal lifestyle were identified, the most dominant being competing demands on time. Although females were generally satisfied with the secondary care they received antenatally, they felt abandoned postnatally and were uncertain what to expect from their GP in terms of follow-up and support. Females felt postnatal care could be improved by greater clarity regarding this, and enhanced by peer support, multidisciplinary input, and subsidised facilities. Technology was seen as a potential adjunct by providing information, enabling flexible and personalised self-management, and facilitating social support. A more tailored approach for females previously diagnosed with GD may help reduce the risk of progression to T2DM. A need for future research to test the efficacy of using technology as an adjunct to current care was identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 243 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Unspecified 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 16 7%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 80 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Unspecified 24 10%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 88 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,673,324
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#846
of 4,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,589
of 331,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#28
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.