↓ Skip to main content

The effect of resistant dextrin as a prebiotic on metabolic parameters and androgen level in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled, clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
The effect of resistant dextrin as a prebiotic on metabolic parameters and androgen level in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled, clinical trial
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00394-018-1648-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sevda Gholizadeh Shamasbi, Parvin Dehgan, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi, Akbar Aliasgarzadeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common abnormalities in women of reproductive age that can lead to a variety of metabolic and reproductive disorders. Studies reveal that a healthy diet is the most effective way for treating the risk factors associated with metabolic disorders and place greater emphasis on the consumption of prebiotic foods. The present study aims to determine the effect of resistant Dextrin on metabolic parameters, including lipid profile, fasting blood glucose (FBS) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and androgen levels, including serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and free testosterone, as the primary outcomes, and manifestations of PCOS including menstrual cycle irregularity and hirsutism, as the secondary outcomes. This randomized, controlled, triple-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 62 women aged 18-45 in Tabriz, Iran, in 2016-2017. The participants were divided into a prebiotic group and a placebo group using block randomization. The prebiotic group consumed 20 g of resistant dextrin dissolved in a glass of water and the placebo group 20 g of maltodextrin also dissolved in a glass of water on a daily basis for 3 months. To measure the serum lipid profile, FBS, hsCRP, DHEA-S and free testosterone before and 3 months after the intervention, 5-ml blood samples were collected from the participants and analyzed using the ELISA method. The Ferriman-Gallwey scale for assessing hirsutism and a checklist for assessing menstrual cycle characteristics were completed before and 3 months after the intervention. A general linear model was used to analyze the data. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and baseline values. 3 months after the intervention, based on the ANCOVA and after adjusting for the baseline values, the mean serum levels of LDL-C (adjusted mean difference = - 29.79; 95% CI = - 43.37 to - 16.21; P < 0.001), triglyceride (AMD = - 38.50; 95% CI = - 59.73 to - 17.28; P = 0.001), total cholesterol (AMD = - 29.98; 95% CI = - 40.14 to - 19.82; P < 0.001), FBS (AMD = - 11.24; 95% CI = - 15.43 to - 7.06; P < 0.001), hsCRP (AMD = - 1.75; 95% CI = - 2.92 to - 0.57; P = 0.004), DHEA-S (AMD = - 0.7; 95% CI = - 1.34 to - 0.13; P = 0.017) and free testosterone (AMD = - 0.32; 95% CI = - 0.56 to - 0.08; P = 0.010) revealed a statistically significant decrease in the intervention group compared to the placebo group, while the mean serum HDL-C showed a statistically significant increase in this group compared to the placebo group (AMD = 5.82; 95% CI = 2.27-9.37; P = 0.002). 3 months after the intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of menstrual cycle intervals and hirsutism (P < 0.001). Resistant dextrin consumption can regulate metabolic parameters and androgen levels and manifestations including hirsutism and menstrual cycle irregularity in women with PCOS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Unspecified 11 6%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 58 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Unspecified 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,005,901
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,434
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,495
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#41
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.