↓ Skip to main content

Co-regulation of photosynthetic processes under potassium deficiency across CO2 levels in soybean: mechanisms of limitations and adaptations

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Co-regulation of photosynthetic processes under potassium deficiency across CO2 levels in soybean: mechanisms of limitations and adaptations
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11120-018-0490-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shardendu K. Singh, Vangimalla R. Reddy

Abstract

Plants photosynthesis-related traits are co-regulated to capture light and CO2to optimize the rate of CO2assimilation (A). The rising CO2often benefits, but potassium (K) deficiency adversely affects A that contributes to the majority of plant biomass. To evaluate mechanisms of photosynthetic limitations and adaptations, soybean was grown under controlled conditions with an adequate (control, 5.0 mM) and two K-deficient (moderate, 0.50 and severe, 0.02 mM) levels under ambient (aCO2; 400 µmol mol-1) and elevated CO2(eCO2; 800 µmol mol-1). Results showed that under severe K deficiency, pigments, leaf absorption, processes of light and dark reactions, and CO2diffusion through stomata and mesophyll were down co-regulated with A while light compensation point increased and photorespiration, alternative electron fluxes, and respiration were up-regulated. However, under moderate K deficiency, these traits were well co-regulated with the sustained A without any obvious limitations amid ≈ 50% reduction in leaf K level. Primary mechanism of K limitation to A was either biochemical processes (Lb≈ 60%) under control and moderate K deficiency or the CO2diffusion limitations (DL≈ 70%) with greater impacts of mesophyll than stomatal pathways under severe K deficiency. The eCO2increased DLwhile lessened the Lbunder K deficiency. Adaptation strategies to severe K deficiency included an enhanced K utilization efficiency (KUE), and reduction of photosystem II excitation pressure by decreasing photosynthetic pigments, light absorption, and photochemical quenching while increasing photorespiration and alternative electron fluxes. The eCO2also stimulated A and KUE when K deficiency was not severe. Thus, plants responded to K deficiency by a coordinated regulation of photosynthetic processes to optimize A, and eCO2failed to alleviate the DLin severely K-deficient plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 52%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#628
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,997
of 330,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.