↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
429 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00401-011-0841-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Capper, Matthias Preusser, Antje Habel, Felix Sahm, Ulrike Ackermann, Genevieve Schindler, Stefan Pusch, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Hanswalter Zentgraf, Andreas von Deimling

Abstract

Activating mutations of the serine threonine kinase v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) are frequent in benign and malignant human tumors and are emerging as an important biomarker. Over 95% of BRAF mutations are of the V600E type and specific small molecular inhibitors are currently under pre-clinical or clinical investigation. BRAF mutation status is determined by DNA-based methods, most commonly by sequencing. Here we describe the development of a monoclonal BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody that can differentiate BRAF V600E and wild type protein in routinely processed formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. A total of 47 intracerebral melanoma metastases and 21 primary papillary thyroid carcinomas were evaluated by direct sequencing of BRAF and by immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody clone VE1. Correlation of VE1 immunohistochemistry and BRAF sequencing revealed a perfect match for both papillary thyroid carcinomas and melanoma metastases. The staining intensity in BRAF V600E mutated tumor samples ranged from weak to strong. The generally homogenous VE1 staining patterns argue against a clonal heterogeneity of the tumors investigated. Caution is essential when only poorly preserved tissue is available for VE1 immunohistochemical analysis or when tissues with only little total BRAF protein are analyzed. Immunohistochemistry using antibody VE1 may substantially facilitate molecular analysis of BRAF V600E status for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 46 25%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,853,723
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#389
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,848
of 127,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.