↓ Skip to main content

Factors controlling cyclin B expression

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Factors controlling cyclin B expression
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1006336005587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaki Ito

Abstract

Cyclins control the transition between the phases of the eukaryotic cell cycle as regulatory subunits of the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Phase-specific activation of the CDK is in part regulated by phase-specific expression of their cyclin component. In most eukaryotic cells including higher plant, B-type cyclin genes are expressed specifically at G2/M phase during the cell cycle. Promoters from yeast, plant and animal B-type cyclin genes are all activated in a cell cycle-regulated manner. In yeast, a transcription factor, Mcm1, in cooperation with an uncloned factor SFF, regulates the cell cycle-dependent promoter activation of mitotic B-type cyclin genes, CLB1 and CLB2. Activity of the human cyclin B1 promoter is regulated by a complex mechanism involving multiple cis-acting elements, none of which are sufficient for G2/M-specific promoter activation. In contrast, plants employ a simple mechanism for cell cycle-regulated promoter activation of B-type cyclin genes. Plant B-type cyclin gene promoters contain a common cis-acting element, called the MSA element, which is necessary and sufficient for the phase-specific promoter activation. MSA-like sequences are also found in the promoters of G2/M-specific genes encoding kinesin-like proteins, suggesting that a defined set of G2/M-specific genes are co-regulated by a common MSA-mediated mechanism in plants. Thus, the molecular mechanisms regulating B-type cyclin gene expression are evolutionarily divergent, and the MSA-mediated mechanism seems to be specific to plants. The consensus sequence of the MSA element resembles the binding sites of animal Myb transcription factors. A set of our data suggest the possibility that plant Myb may have unexpected roles in G2/M by inducing B-type cyclin genes, together with other cell cycle-related genes in plants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 27%
Chemistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#1,017
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,802
of 38,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.