↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral Mechanisms Contributing to Osteoarthritis Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral Mechanisms Contributing to Osteoarthritis Pain
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11926-018-0716-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delfien Syx, Phuong B. Tran, Rachel E. Miller, Anne-Marie Malfait

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and a major source of pain and disability worldwide. OA-associated pain is usually refractory to classically used analgesics, and disease-modifying therapies are still lacking. Therefore, a better understanding of mechanisms and mediators contributing to the generation and maintenance of OA pain is critical for the development of efficient and safe pain-relieving therapies. Both peripheral and central mechanisms contribute to OA pain. Clinical evidence suggests that a strong peripheral nociceptive drive from the affected joint maintains pain and central sensitization associated with OA. Mediators present in the OA joint, including nerve growth factor, chemokines, cytokines, and inflammatory cells can contribute to sensitization. Furthermore, structural alterations in joint innervation and nerve damage occur in the course of OA. Several interrelated pathological processes, including joint damage, structural reorganization of joint afferents, low-grade inflammation, neuroplasticity, and nerve damage all contribute to the pain observed in OA. It can be anticipated that elucidating exactly how these mechanisms are operational in the course of progressive OA may lead to the identification of novel targets for intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 56 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 61 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,411,646
of 25,129,395 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#302
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,572
of 336,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,129,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.