↓ Skip to main content

Professor W Mike Edmunds: a pioneer in applied hydrogeochemistry and champion of international collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Professor W Mike Edmunds: a pioneer in applied hydrogeochemistry and champion of international collaboration
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10040-017-1689-7
Authors

Paul Shand, W. George Darling, Pauline L. Smedley, Adrian H. Bath, John Mather, Teresa Melo, Klaus Hinsby, Paul G. Whitehead, Rob Hope

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#539
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,232
of 431,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.