| Title |
Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-007-9167-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew C. Good, Tudor I. Oprea |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 50 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#431
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,765
of 174,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.