↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of biaryl piperidine and 4-amino-2-biarylurea MCH1 receptor antagonists using QSAR modeling, classification techniques and virtual screening

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Optimization of biaryl piperidine and 4-amino-2-biarylurea MCH1 receptor antagonists using QSAR modeling, classification techniques and virtual screening
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10822-007-9112-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia Melagraki, Antreas Afantitis, Haralambos Sarimveis, Panayiotis A. Koutentis, John Markopoulos, Olga Igglessi-Markopoulou

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an optimization study on biaryl piperidine and 4-amino-2-biarylurea MCH1 receptor antagonists, which was accomplished by using quantitative-structure activity relationships (QSARs), classification and virtual screening techniques. First, a linear QSAR model was developed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Analysis, while the Elimination Selection-Stepwise Regression (ES-SWR) method was adopted for selecting the most suitable input variables. The predictive activity of the model was evaluated using an external validation set and the Y-randomization technique. Based on the selected descriptors, the Support Vector Machines (SVM) classification technique was utilized to classify data into two categories: "actives" or "non-actives". Several attempts were made to optimize the scaffold of most potent compounds by inducing various structural modifications. Potential derivatives with improved activities were identified, as they were classified "actives" by the SVM classifier. Their activities were estimated using the produced MLR model. A detailed analysis on the model applicability domain defined the compounds, whose estimations can be accepted with confidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 21%
Other 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#420
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,300
of 91,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.