| Title |
Folding funnels and conformational transitions via hinge-bending motions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02738169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandeep Kumar, Buyong Ma, Chung-Jung Tsai, Haim Wolfson, Ruth Nussinov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 23% |
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#127
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,838
of 35,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.