↓ Skip to main content

Quasi-random graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Quasi-random graphs
Published in
Combinatorica, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02125347
Authors

F. R. K. Chung, R. L. Graham, R. M. Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Professor 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 9 45%
Computer Science 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,752,409
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#64
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,641
of 59,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them