| Title |
A Controlled Trial of Active Versus Passive Learning Strategies in a Large Group Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:ahse.0000012213.62043.45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Haidet, Robert O. Morgan, Kimberly O'Malley, Betty Jeanne Moran, Boyd F. Richards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Professor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 32% |
| Unknown | 43 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 15% |
| Psychology | 18 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 23% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#210
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,125
of 63,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them