↓ Skip to main content

What makes flank eruptions? The 2001 Etna eruption and its possible triggering mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
What makes flank eruptions? The 2001 Etna eruption and its possible triggering mechanisms
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, March 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00445-003-0280-3
Authors

V. Acocella, M. Neri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 71 78%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#445
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,991
of 62,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.