↓ Skip to main content

Generic delimitation and phylogenetic uncertainty:an example from a group that has undergone an explosive radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Systematic Botany, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generic delimitation and phylogenetic uncertainty:an example from a group that has undergone an explosive radiation
Published in
Australian Systematic Botany, March 2005
DOI 10.1071/sb04016
Authors

L. A. Orthia, L. G. Cook, M. D. Crisp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Cameroon 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 37 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 73%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Australian Systematic Botany
#95
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,894
of 74,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Systematic Botany
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.