↓ Skip to main content

A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01761831
Authors

Steve Graham, Naomi Weintraub

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 16%
Psychology 19 13%
Computer Science 16 11%
Linguistics 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,852,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#436
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,752
of 26,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them