↓ Skip to main content

Corinthian bronze and the gold of the alchemists

Overview of attention for article published in Gold Bulletin, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Corinthian bronze and the gold of the alchemists
Published in
Gold Bulletin, June 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf03216582
Authors

David M Jacobson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 11%
United Kingdom 1 6%
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 14 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Lecturer 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 5 28%
Social Sciences 3 17%
Materials Science 3 17%
Chemistry 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gold Bulletin
#62
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,726
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gold Bulletin
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them