| Title |
The establishment of two cell lines from the insectspodoptera frugiperda (lepidoptera; noctuidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, April 1977
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02615077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. L. Vaughn, R. H. Goodwin, G. J. Tompkins, P. McCawley |
| Abstract |
The history and characteristics of two cells lines developed from primary explants of pupal tissue from the insect, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), are described. One cell line, IPLB-SF 21, was developed with hemolymph-supplemented medium and has been maintained continuously on the medium. The second cell line, IPLB-SF-1254, was developed with a medium containing a combination of vertebrate sera plus hemolymph and was adapted to hemolyphn-free medium at the 6th passage. The IPLB-SF-21 cell line has a population doubling time of 26 to 30 hr; the doubling time of the IPLB-SF-1254 line is 36 hr. The chromosomal morphology and distribution was typical of other lepidopteran cell lines. Serological studies showed that both cell lines have at least one antigen which also is common is tissue antigens from pupae of Spodoptera frugiperda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 298 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 77 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,315,555
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology
#1
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them