| Title |
Development of macular retinoschisis long after the onset of retinal arterial occlusion (RAO): a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12886-018-0730-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Norihiko Ishizaki, Teruyo Kida, Masanori Fukumoto, Takaki Sato, Hidehiro Oku, Tsunehiko Ikeda |
| Abstract |
To describe a retrospective study of macular retinoschisis that developed long after the onset of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). We describe changes in macular findings and visual acuity (VA) of 29 patients (21 males and 8 females, mean age: 66.1 ± 16.9 years) with RAO (18 branch RAOs [BRAOs] and 11 central RAOs [CRAOs] who visited Osaka Medical College Hospital over an 8-year period based on a medical chart review. The mean VA (logMAR) increased from 1.06 ± 1.08 (CRAO: 2.04 ± 0.99; BRAO: 0.37 ± 0.40) at the first visit to 0.71 ± 0.87 (CRAO: 1.46 ± 0.86; BRAO: 0.18 ± 0.30) at the final visit. Macular OCT revealed swelling or hyper-reflectivity of the inner retina in the early phase of RAO and retinal thinning in the late phase. Among the 29 patients, two patients (a patient with BRAO and a patient with CRAO) developed macular retinoschisis about 1 year after RAO onset. The VA of the patient with BRAO was 20/300 at the first visit, and it improved to 20/25 two days after onset following eye massage and anterior chamber paracentesis. However, his VA worsened, declining from 20/25 to 20/50, and retinoschisis occurred 13 months after RAO onset. The patient with CRAO showed macular changes including small cystoids at the first follow-up visit more than 3 weeks after onset and developed retinoschisis 11 months after the first visit. In addition, two patients with BRAO and one patient with CRAO developed macular changes including small cystoids 3 weeks after onset, with the BRAO complicated by retinal vein occlusion. In the CRAO patient, the cystoid macular edema was resolved 1 month after the first visit. Macular retinoschisis is unusual, but a possible complication of RAO that can develop long after the onset of the occlusion, potentially resulting in renewed VA deterioration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#833
of 2,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,956
of 330,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.