↓ Skip to main content

Conservation unit status inferred for plants by combining interspecific crosses and AFLP

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Conservation unit status inferred for plants by combining interspecific crosses and AFLP
Published in
Conservation Genetics, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10592-006-9277-8
Authors

Florence Nicolè, Florence Tellier, Agnès Vivat, Irène Till-Bottraud

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
France 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Guatemala 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 35 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 62%
Environmental Science 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#475
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,170
of 161,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.