| Title |
Functional cloning of an endo-arabinanase from Aspergillus aculeatus and its heterologous expression in A. oryzae and tobacco
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004380100489 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Skjøt, S. Kauppinen, L. Kofod, C. Fuglsang, M. Pauly, H. Dalbøge, L. Andersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#920
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.