↓ Skip to main content

Mind-altering with the gut: Modulation of the gut-brain axis with probiotics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 864)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
577 Mendeley
Title
Mind-altering with the gut: Modulation of the gut-brain axis with probiotics
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12275-018-8032-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namhee Kim, Misun Yun, Young Joon Oh, Hak-Jong Choi

Abstract

It is increasingly evident that bidirectional interactions exist among the gastrointestinal tract, the enteric nervous system, and the central nervous system. Recent preclinical and clinical trials have shown that gut microbiota plays an important role in these gut-brain interactions. Furthermore, alterations in gut microbiota composition may be associated with pathogenesis of various neurological disorders, including stress, autism, depression, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, the concepts of the microbiota-gut-brain axis is emerging. Here, we review the role of gut microbiota in bidirectional interactions between the gut and the brain, including neural, immune-mediated, and metabolic mechanisms. We highlight recent advances in the understanding of probiotic modulation of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders via the gut-brain axis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 577 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 111 19%
Student > Master 80 14%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 103 18%
Unknown 156 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 12%
Neuroscience 47 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 6%
Other 128 22%
Unknown 179 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#932,200
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#8
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,764
of 336,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.