↓ Skip to main content

Aggregating sequences that occur in many proteins constitute weak spots of bacterial proteostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aggregating sequences that occur in many proteins constitute weak spots of bacterial proteostasis
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03131-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ladan Khodaparast, Laleh Khodaparast, Rodrigo Gallardo, Nikolaos N. Louros, Emiel Michiels, Reshmi Ramakrishnan, Meine Ramakers, Filip Claes, Lydia Young, Mohammad Shahrooei, Hannah Wilkinson, Matyas Desager, Wubishet Mengistu Tadesse, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Per Hammarström, Abram Aertsen, Sebastien Carpentier, Johan Van Eldere, Frederic Rousseau, Joost Schymkowitz

Abstract

Aggregation is a sequence-specific process, nucleated by short aggregation-prone regions (APRs) that can be exploited to induce aggregation of proteins containing the same APR. Here, we find that most APRs are unique within a proteome, but that a small minority of APRs occur in many proteins. When aggregation is nucleated in bacteria by such frequently occurring APRs, it leads to massive and lethal inclusion body formation containing a large number of proteins. Buildup of bacterial resistance against these peptides is slow. In addition, the approach is effective against drug-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii, reducing bacterial load in a murine bladder infection model. Our results indicate that redundant APRs are weak points of bacterial protein homeostasis and that targeting these may be an attractive antibacterial strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#513,926
of 25,393,528 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,733
of 56,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,851
of 344,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#236
of 1,208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.