↓ Skip to main content

Sexuality of Male-to-Female Transsexuals

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Sexuality of Male-to-Female Transsexuals
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9306-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaimie F. Veale, Dave E. Clarke, Terri C. Lomax

Abstract

Blanchard's (J Nerv Ment Dis 177:616-623, 1989) theory of autogynephilia suggests that male-to-female transsexuals can be categorized into different types based on their sexuality. Little previous research has compared the sexuality of male-to-female transsexuals to biological females. The present study examined 15 aspects of sexuality among a non-clinical sample of 234 transsexuals and 127 biological females, using either an online or a paper questionnaire. The results showed that, overall, transsexuals tended to place more importance on partner's physical attractiveness and reported higher scores on Blanchard's Core Autogynephilia Scale than biological females. In addition, transsexuals classified as autogynephilic scored significantly higher on Attraction to Feminine Males, Core Autogynephilia, Autogynephilic Interpersonal Fantasy, Fetishism, Preference for Younger Partners, Interest in Uncommitted Sex, Importance of Partner Physical Attractiveness, and Attraction to Transgender Fiction than other transsexuals and biological females. In accordance with Blanchard's theory, autogynephilia measures were positively correlated to Sexual Attraction to Females among transsexuals. In contrast to Blanchard's theory, however, those transsexuals classified as autogynephilic scored higher on average on Sexual Attraction to Males than those classified as non-autogynephilic, and no transsexuals classified as autogynephilic reported asexuality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Computer Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,326,384
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#679
of 3,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,015
of 95,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.