↓ Skip to main content

Distal myopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Distal myopathies
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004150050557
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Illa

Abstract

Distal myopathies are classified according to clinical, histopathological, and genetic patterns into the following: late adult onset type 1, or Welander myopathy, the first recognized distal myopathy with autosomal dominant inheritance and very recently linked to chromosome 2p; late adult onset type 2, or Markesbery-Griggs/Udd myopathy, autosomal dominant with linkage to chromosome 2q; early adult onset type 1, or Nonaka myopathy, an autosomal recessive disease linked to 9p1-q1 and considered indistinguishable from hereditary inclusion body myopathy; early adult onset type 2, or Miyoshi myopathy, with autosomal recessive inheritance linked to chromosome 2p12-p14; and early adult onset type 3, or Laing myopathy, autosomal dominant with linkage to chromosome 14. Very recently, dysferlin, a novel skeletal muscle gene, has been found mutated in Miyoshi myopathy and also in the limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B, a disease with a completely different phenotype. This indicates that the classification of the distal and other genetically determined muscle diseases will probably change when these myopathies are understood at the molecular level. For example, it would be reasonable to use the term dysferlinopathies to describe all the diseases due to dysferlin mutations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#2,117
of 4,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.