Title |
Improving Relative Bioavailability of Dicumarol by Reducing Particle Size and Adding the Adhesive Poly(Fumaric-Co-Sebacic) Anhydride
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, July 2003
|
DOI | 10.1023/a:1024474609667 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. G. Thanos, Z. Liu, J. Reineke, E. Edwards, E. Mathiowitz |
Abstract |
This study was carried out to show the effect of particle size reduction and bioadhesion on the dissolution and relative bioavailability of dicumarol. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,134
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,464
of 52,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.