↓ Skip to main content

Intragastric Administration of Lactobacillus plantarum and 2,2′-Dithiodipyridine-Inactivated Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Does Not Protect Indian Rhesus Macaques from Intrarectal SIV Challenge…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Virology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intragastric Administration of Lactobacillus plantarum and 2,2′-Dithiodipyridine-Inactivated Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Does Not Protect Indian Rhesus Macaques from Intrarectal SIV Challenge or Reduce Virus Replication after Transmission
Published in
Journal of Virology, April 2018
DOI 10.1128/jvi.02030-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane G. Carnathan, Joseph J. Mackel, Shelby L. Sweat, Chiamaka A. Enemuo, Etse H. Gebru, Pallavi Dhadvai, Sailaja Gangadhara, Sakeenah Hicks, Thomas H. Vanderford, Rama R. Amara, José Esparza, Wei Lu, Jean-Marie Andrieu, Guido Silvestri

Abstract

A major obstacle to development of an effective AIDS vaccine is that along with intended beneficial responses, immunization regimen may activate CD4+ T cells that can facilitate acquisition of HIV by serving as target cells for the virus. Lu et al. reported that intra-gastric administration of chemically inactivated SIVmac239(iSIV) andLactobacillus plantarum(LP) (iSIV+LP) protected 15/16 Chinese-origin rhesus macaques (RMs) from high-dose intra-rectal SIVmac239challenge at three months post-immunization. They attributed the observed protection to induction of immune tolerance, mediated by "MHC-Ib/E-restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells that suppressed SIV-harboring CD4+ T cell activation and ex vivo SIV replication in 15/16 animals without inducing SIV-specific antibodies or cytotoxic T". Andrieu et al subsequently reported protection from infection in 23/24 RM immunized intragastrically or intravaginally with iSIV and BCG, LP orLactobacillus rhamnosus, which they ascribed to the same tolerogenic mechanism. Using vaccine materials obtained from our co-authors, we conducted an immunization and challenge experiment in 54 Indian RMs, and included control groups receiving iSIV only or LP only, as well as unvaccinated animals. Intra-rectal challenge with SIVmac239resulted in rapid infection in all groups of vaccinated RMs as well as unvaccinated controls. iSIV+LP vaccinated animals that became SIV infected showed viral loads similar to those observed in animals receiving iSIV only, LP only, and unvaccinated controls. The protection from SIV transmission conferred by intra-gastric iSIV+LP administration reported previously for Chinese origin RMs was not observed when the same experiment was conducted in a larger cohort of Indian-origin animals.IMPORTANCE:Despite increased understanding in immune responses against HIV, a safe and effective AIDS vaccine is not yet available. One obstacle is that immunization may activate CD4+ T cells that could act as target cells for acquisition of HIV. An alternative strategy could involve induction of a tolerizing response that limits the availability of activated CD4+ T cells, thus limiting the ability of virus to establish infection. In this regard, exciting results were obtained in Chinese-origin rhesus macaques by using a "tolerogenic" vaccine consisting of intra-gastric administration of Lactobacillus plantarum and AT-2-inactivated SIV (iSIV+LP) which showed highly significant protection from virus transmission. Here, we administered iSIV+LP immunizations to Indian-origin rhesus macaques, and failed to observe any protective effect from virus acquisition in this experimental setting. This work is important as it contributes to the overall assessment of the clinical potential of a new candidate AIDS vaccine platform based on the iSIV+LP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#10,324
of 25,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,704
of 339,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#49
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.