↓ Skip to main content

Mutual Reproductive Benefits Between a Wild Orchid, Bulbophyllum patens, and Bactrocera Fruit Flies via a Floral Synomone

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Mutual Reproductive Benefits Between a Wild Orchid, Bulbophyllum patens, and Bactrocera Fruit Flies via a Floral Synomone
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1005477926244
Authors

Keng-hong Tan, Ritsuo Nishida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 53%
Chemistry 8 7%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#686
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,719
of 111,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.