| Title |
Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: a review of the research and empirical exploration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0 |
| Authors |
Khe Foon Hew, Wing Sum Cheung, Connie Siew Ling Ng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 79 | 37% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 16 | 7% |
| Psychology | 16 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,413,521
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#126
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,627
of 185,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them