You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
病院前救護活動における血液の絞り出しおよび穿刺部位の違いが血糖値に与える影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.11240/jsem.21.1 |
| Authors |
藤森 隆史, 竹中 ゆかり, 仲村 佳彦, 江藤 茂, 三渕 拓司, 吉村 健清 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#76
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,696
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.