↓ Skip to main content

A “matched” sensory reference can guide goal-directed movements of the affected hand in central post-stroke sensory ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A “matched” sensory reference can guide goal-directed movements of the affected hand in central post-stroke sensory ataxia
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00221-018-5214-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michihiro Osumi, Masahiko Sumitani, Yuko Otake, Shu Morioka

Abstract

Patients with central post-stroke sensory ataxia (CPSA) suffer from not only somatosensory dysfunction but also the ataxic movement disorder of the affected limb. These sensory and motor impairments possibly interfere each other, but such interference is still unclear. We evaluated smoothness of grasp movements in CPSA patients using a kinematic analysis, and verified the effect of somatosensory reference from the intact hand on grasp movements. Eight CPSA patients were enrolled. We recorded their reach-and-pinch movements of both affected and intact hands toward the tip of the 3-cm-diameter vertical bar, using a three-dimensional measurement system. When executing these movements of one hand, the patients simultaneously pinched the same diameter bar as the goal tip (matched-reference condition: Matched-Ref) or the 5-cm-diameter thicker bar (mismatched-reference condition: Mismatched-Ref) by the other hand. The normalized jerk index (i.e., movement smoothness) of the affected hand was disturbed compared with the intact hand. The kinematic data of the finger opening and closing phases were also disturbed. These disturbances were partially improved with Matched-Ref but not Mismatched-Ref of the intact hand. We successfully evaluated the features of CPSA, indicating that the somatosensory reference method could be useful for rehabilitation in sensory ataxia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 14 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,839,807
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,905
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,661
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.