↓ Skip to main content

Isoprenoid biosynthesis in hereditary periodic fever syndromes and inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Isoprenoid biosynthesis in hereditary periodic fever syndromes and inflammation
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00018-003-2296-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. M. Houten, J. Frenkel, H. R. Waterham

Abstract

Mevalonate kinase (MK) is an essential enzyme in the isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway which produces numerous biomolecules (isoprenoids) involved in a variety of cellular processes. The indispensability of MK and isoprenoid biosynthesis for human health is demonstrated by the identification of its deficiency as the biochemical and molecular cause of the inherited autoinflammatory disorders mevalonic aciduria and hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome. Since the discovery of the genetic defect, considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular, biochemical and immunological basis of MK deficiency. Important questions such as which specific protein(s) and/or signaling pathway(s) are affected, however, remain unanswered. Resolving the complete pathophysiology of this disorder is a major challenge, but eventually will give insight into the in vivo role of MK and isoprenoid biosynthesis in inflammation and fever. This may open novel options for antiinflammatory therapies in general. Here, we give a general introduction on isoprenoid biosynthesis, the regulation thereof and deficiencies therein. We review the molecular, biochemical and immunological aspects of MK deficiency and discuss the relations between isoprenoid biosynthesis and inflammation. Finally, we compare MK deficiency with other autoinflammatory syndromes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 7 23%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,286
of 51,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.